Saturday, March 21, 2020

The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Essays

The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Essays The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Paper The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Paper Morpheme From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search In linguistics, a morpheme is the smallest component of a word, or other linguistic unit, that has semantic meaning. The term is used as part of the branch of linguistics known as morphology (linguistics). A morpheme is composed by phoneme(s) (the smallest linguistically distinctive units of sound) in spoken language, and by grapheme(s) (the smallest units of written language) in written language. The concept of word and morpheme are different: a morpheme may or may not stand alone. One or several morphemes compose a word. A morpheme is free if it can stand alone (ex: lie, cake), or bound if it is used exclusively alongside a free morpheme (ex: im in impossible). Its actual phonetic representation is the morph, with the different morphs (in-, im-) representing the same morpheme being grouped as its allomorphs. English example: The word unbreakable has three morphemes: un-, a bound morpheme; break, a free morpheme; and -able, a bound morpheme. un- is also a prefix, -able is a suffix. Both un- and -able are affixes. The morpheme plural-s has the morph -s, /s/, in cats (/k? ts/), but -es, /? z/, in dishes (/d z/), and even the voiced -s, /z/, in dogs (/d z/). -s. These are allomorphs. Whether or not a word is divided on all available morphemes is debatable. Some morphologists decompose the words completely as it was formed etymologically while others only decompose what there is evidence to decompose in the modern use of the word. The word governmental has either three morphemes: govern, a free morpheme: ment, a bound morpheme; and -al, a bound morpheme. Or, depending on the syntactic framework, it has two morphemes: government and -al. The word predict has either two morphemes: pre- a bound morpheme, and dict a bound morpheme, or one morpheme: predict a free morpheme. tense, number, aspect, and so on, without deriving a new word or a word in a new grammatical category (as in the dog morpheme if written with the plural marker morpheme -s becomes dogs). They carry grammatical information. Allomorphs are variants of a morpheme, e. g. , the plural marker in English is sometimes realized as /-z/, /-s/ or /-? z/ Other variants Null morpheme Root morpheme Word stem Morphological analysis In natural language processing for Japanese, Chinese and other languages, morphological analysis is a process of segmenting a given sentence into a row of morphemes. It is closely related to Part-of-speech tagging, but word segmentation is required for these languages because word boundaries are not indicated by blank spaces. Famous Japanese morphological analysers include Juman, ChaSen and Mecab. Changing definitions of Morpheme In gennerative grammar the definition of a morpheme depends heavily on whether syntactic trees have morphemes as leafs or features as leafs. Direct surface to syntax mapping LFG – leafs are words Direct syntax to semantics mapping Leafs in syntactic trees spell out morphemes: Distributed morphology – leafs are morphemes o Branches in syntactic trees spell out morphemes:Radical Minimalism and Nanosyntax -leafs are nano morpho-syntactic features Given the definition of morpheme as the smallest meaningful unit Nanosyntax aims to account for idioms where it is often an entire syntactic tree which contributes the smallest meaningful unit. An example idiom is Dont let the cat out of the bag where the idiom is composed of let the cat out of the bag and that might be considered a semantic morpheme, which is composed of many syntactic morphemes. Other cases where the smallest meaningfull unit is larger than a word include some collocations such as in view of and business intelligence where the words together have a specific meaning. The definition of morphemes also play a significant role in the interfaces of generative grammar in the following theoretical constructs; Event semantics The idea that each productive morpheme must have a compositional semantic meaning (a denotation), and if the meaning is there, there must be a morpheme (null or overt). Spell-out The interface where syntactic/semantic structures are spelled-out using words or morphemes with phonological content. This can also be thought of as lexical insertion into the syntactics See also Personal tools Log in / create account Namespaces Article Discussion Variants Views Read View source View history Actions Search [pic] [pic][pic] Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Cite this page Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Brezhoneg Catala Cesky Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Espanol Esperanto Francais Frysk Gaeilge Galego Hornjoserbsce Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Islenska Italiano Kiswahili Kurdi Limburgs Magyar Nederlands ? Norsk (bokmal)? ? Norsk (nynorsk)? Novial Plattduutsch Polski Portugues Romana Runa Simi Scots Simple English Slovencina / Slovenscina Suomi Svenska Tagalog Turkce Veneto Walon This page was last modified on 31 May 2011 at 04:45. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. a non-profit organization. Contact us Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers [pic] [pic] |We empower you to use this information in making sound instructional decisions to improve reading outcomes. | | | Essentials for Reading Success [pic] |Components of Reading | |Reading research over the last 20 years has identified the critical skills that students must acquire very early in reading | |development to ensure that they can read at grade level by third grade. These skills are in the areas of phonemic awareness,| |phonics, fluency in reading text, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. The development of these skills is critical to | |getting off to a good start in reading, and we can begin to assess them as early as kindergarten. Students who lag behind in| |the development of these skills in early elementary school are in danger of not being able to read at grade level by third | |grade. |Types of Assessment | |Assessment is the process of collecting data for the purposes of specifying and verifying problems, and making instructional| |decisions about students. Assessment may be formal or informal and is conducted through a variety of methods: record | |reviews, interviews, observations, and testing. There are three types of assessments that are typically used to inform | |instruction: screening, progress monitoring, and diagnostic measures. |Layers of Instruction | |Assessment is the process of collecting data for the purposes of speci fying and verifying problems, and making instructional| |decisions about students. Assessment may be formal or informal and is conducted through a variety of methods: record | |reviews, interviews, observations, and testing. There are three types of assessments that are typically used to inform | |instruction: screening, progress monitoring, and diagnostic measures. | Elements of Effective Instruction [pic] High quality reading instruction incorporates the five components of reading delivered through a coherent instructional design. Research has repeatedly demonstrated the importance of initial instruction that includes the five critical components of reading: Phonological Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Comprehension. To be most effective, the five critical components need to be taught explicitly within classrooms that are strongly positive and engaging, use writing activities to support literacy, and provide students with many opportunities to read interesting text and complete authentic reading and writing assignments. Teachers typically follow a core reading curriculum to guide instruction in whole and small group settings. Small group instruction should be individualized to reflect the instructional needs of the students. Individual student needs are determined by formal screening and progress monitoring assessments, classroom assessments, and teacher observations. The goal is to use information from multiple sources to group students in a way that makes instruction in critical reading skills most efficient. For more information on the content and sequence for delivery of these please see Components of Reading. How to Differentiate Instruction [pic] What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated Instruction is matching instruction to meet the needs of individual learners. The teacher forms small, flexible teacher–led instructional groups based on student data and observations. The teacher groups students with similar instructional needs, limiting the size of the group based on the intensity of instruction needed. The focus and format of reading skills instruction varies with the skill level of the students. How often and how long the teacher meets with each small group varies depending on student needs. Students who are more at risk will need to meet more frequently and for longer periods. This small group targeted skill instruction supplements and reinforces high quality and consistent initial reading instruction. When is Differentiated Instruction Implemented? Differentiated Instruction is implemented during the 90+ minute reading block. Whole group instruction is provided using the core reading curriculum as a guide, and is usually followed by small group reading centers to develop reading skills both cooperatively and independently. During the reading center time, the classroom teacher meets with small groups to provide systematic and explicit instruction in identified reading skill areas. How is Differentiated Instruction Implemented in the Classroom? Differentiated Instruction is implemented in the teacher-led group. The teacher forms small, flexible groups based on student data and observations. Students and classes vary from one another in many important ways. For that reason, there is no one correct way to place students into small groups for instruction. The suggested number of students per group is 1-4 for struggling readers (intensive and strategic) and 5-8 for those students on grade level for reading. The smaller group size is needed for struggling readers because it allows the teacher more opportunity to individualize reading instruction. The classroom is then organized based on how frequently the teacher needs to meet with each group per week (e. g. , group meets daily, group meets 3 times per week) and the number of minutes per day (e. g. , 10 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes).

The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Essays

The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Essays The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Paper The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Paper Morpheme From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search In linguistics, a morpheme is the smallest component of a word, or other linguistic unit, that has semantic meaning. The term is used as part of the branch of linguistics known as morphology (linguistics). A morpheme is composed by phoneme(s) (the smallest linguistically distinctive units of sound) in spoken language, and by grapheme(s) (the smallest units of written language) in written language. The concept of word and morpheme are different: a morpheme may or may not stand alone. One or several morphemes compose a word. A morpheme is free if it can stand alone (ex: lie, cake), or bound if it is used exclusively alongside a free morpheme (ex: im in impossible). Its actual phonetic representation is the morph, with the different morphs (in-, im-) representing the same morpheme being grouped as its allomorphs. English example: The word unbreakable has three morphemes: un-, a bound morpheme; break, a free morpheme; and -able, a bound morpheme. un- is also a prefix, -able is a suffix. Both un- and -able are affixes. The morpheme plural-s has the morph -s, /s/, in cats (/k? ts/), but -es, /? z/, in dishes (/d z/), and even the voiced -s, /z/, in dogs (/d z/). -s. These are allomorphs. Whether or not a word is divided on all available morphemes is debatable. Some morphologists decompose the words completely as it was formed etymologically while others only decompose what there is evidence to decompose in the modern use of the word. The word governmental has either three morphemes: govern, a free morpheme: ment, a bound morpheme; and -al, a bound morpheme. Or, depending on the syntactic framework, it has two morphemes: government and -al. The word predict has either two morphemes: pre- a bound morpheme, and dict a bound morpheme, or one morpheme: predict a free morpheme. tense, number, aspect, and so on, without deriving a new word or a word in a new grammatical category (as in the dog morpheme if written with the plural marker morpheme -s becomes dogs). They carry grammatical information. Allomorphs are variants of a morpheme, e. g. , the plural marker in English is sometimes realized as /-z/, /-s/ or /-? z/ Other variants Null morpheme Root morpheme Word stem Morphological analysis In natural language processing for Japanese, Chinese and other languages, morphological analysis is a process of segmenting a given sentence into a row of morphemes. It is closely related to Part-of-speech tagging, but word segmentation is required for these languages because word boundaries are not indicated by blank spaces. Famous Japanese morphological analysers include Juman, ChaSen and Mecab. Changing definitions of Morpheme In gennerative grammar the definition of a morpheme depends heavily on whether syntactic trees have morphemes as leafs or features as leafs. Direct surface to syntax mapping LFG – leafs are words Direct syntax to semantics mapping Leafs in syntactic trees spell out morphemes: Distributed morphology – leafs are morphemes o Branches in syntactic trees spell out morphemes:Radical Minimalism and Nanosyntax -leafs are nano morpho-syntactic features Given the definition of morpheme as the smallest meaningful unit Nanosyntax aims to account for idioms where it is often an entire syntactic tree which contributes the smallest meaningful unit. An example idiom is Dont let the cat out of the bag where the idiom is composed of let the cat out of the bag and that might be considered a semantic morpheme, which is composed of many syntactic morphemes. Other cases where the smallest meaningfull unit is larger than a word include some collocations such as in view of and business intelligence where the words together have a specific meaning. The definition of morphemes also play a significant role in the interfaces of generative grammar in the following theoretical constructs; Event semantics The idea that each productive morpheme must have a compositional semantic meaning (a denotation), and if the meaning is there, there must be a morpheme (null or overt). Spell-out The interface where syntactic/semantic structures are spelled-out using words or morphemes with phonological content. This can also be thought of as lexical insertion into the syntactics See also Personal tools Log in / create account Namespaces Article Discussion Variants Views Read View source View history Actions Search [pic] [pic][pic] Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Cite this page Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Brezhoneg Catala Cesky Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Espanol Esperanto Francais Frysk Gaeilge Galego Hornjoserbsce Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Islenska Italiano Kiswahili Kurdi Limburgs Magyar Nederlands ? Norsk (bokmal)? ? Norsk (nynorsk)? Novial Plattduutsch Polski Portugues Romana Runa Simi Scots Simple English Slovencina / Slovenscina Suomi Svenska Tagalog Turkce Veneto Walon This page was last modified on 31 May 2011 at 04:45. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. a non-profit organization. Contact us Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers [pic] [pic] |We empower you to use this information in making sound instructional decisions to improve reading outcomes. | | | Essentials for Reading Success [pic] |Components of Reading | |Reading research over the last 20 years has identified the critical skills that students must acquire very early in reading | |development to ensure that they can read at grade level by third grade. These skills are in the areas of phonemic awareness,| |phonics, fluency in reading text, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. The development of these skills is critical to | |getting off to a good start in reading, and we can begin to assess them as early as kindergarten. Students who lag behind in| |the development of these skills in early elementary school are in danger of not being able to read at grade level by third | |grade. |Types of Assessment | |Assessment is the process of collecting data for the purposes of specifying and verifying problems, and making instructional| |decisions about students. Assessment may be formal or informal and is conducted through a variety of methods: record | |reviews, interviews, observations, and testing. There are three types of assessments that are typically used to inform | |instruction: screening, progress monitoring, and diagnostic measures. |Layers of Instruction | |Assessment is the process of collecting data for the purposes of speci fying and verifying problems, and making instructional| |decisions about students. Assessment may be formal or informal and is conducted through a variety of methods: record | |reviews, interviews, observations, and testing. There are three types of assessments that are typically used to inform | |instruction: screening, progress monitoring, and diagnostic measures. | Elements of Effective Instruction [pic] High quality reading instruction incorporates the five components of reading delivered through a coherent instructional design. Research has repeatedly demonstrated the importance of initial instruction that includes the five critical components of reading: Phonological Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Comprehension. To be most effective, the five critical components need to be taught explicitly within classrooms that are strongly positive and engaging, use writing activities to support literacy, and provide students with many opportunities to read interesting text and complete authentic reading and writing assignments. Teachers typically follow a core reading curriculum to guide instruction in whole and small group settings. Small group instruction should be individualized to reflect the instructional needs of the students. Individual student needs are determined by formal screening and progress monitoring assessments, classroom assessments, and teacher observations. The goal is to use information from multiple sources to group students in a way that makes instruction in critical reading skills most efficient. For more information on the content and sequence for delivery of these please see Components of Reading. How to Differentiate Instruction [pic] What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated Instruction is matching instruction to meet the needs of individual learners. The teacher forms small, flexible teacher–led instructional groups based on student data and observations. The teacher groups students with similar instructional needs, limiting the size of the group based on the intensity of instruction needed. The focus and format of reading skills instruction varies with the skill level of the students. How often and how long the teacher meets with each small group varies depending on student needs. Students who are more at risk will need to meet more frequently and for longer periods. This small group targeted skill instruction supplements and reinforces high quality and consistent initial reading instruction. When is Differentiated Instruction Implemented? Differentiated Instruction is implemented during the 90+ minute reading block. Whole group instruction is provided using the core reading curriculum as a guide, and is usually followed by small group reading centers to develop reading skills both cooperatively and independently. During the reading center time, the classroom teacher meets with small groups to provide systematic and explicit instruction in identified reading skill areas. How is Differentiated Instruction Implemented in the Classroom? Differentiated Instruction is implemented in the teacher-led group. The teacher forms small, flexible groups based on student data and observations. Students and classes vary from one another in many important ways. For that reason, there is no one correct way to place students into small groups for instruction. The suggested number of students per group is 1-4 for struggling readers (intensive and strategic) and 5-8 for those students on grade level for reading. The smaller group size is needed for struggling readers because it allows the teacher more opportunity to individualize reading instruction. The classroom is then organized based on how frequently the teacher needs to meet with each group per week (e. g. , group meets daily, group meets 3 times per week) and the number of minutes per day (e. g. , 10 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes).

The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Essays

The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Essays The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Paper The Importance of Morphemic Analysis in English Learning Paper Morpheme From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search In linguistics, a morpheme is the smallest component of a word, or other linguistic unit, that has semantic meaning. The term is used as part of the branch of linguistics known as morphology (linguistics). A morpheme is composed by phoneme(s) (the smallest linguistically distinctive units of sound) in spoken language, and by grapheme(s) (the smallest units of written language) in written language. The concept of word and morpheme are different: a morpheme may or may not stand alone. One or several morphemes compose a word. A morpheme is free if it can stand alone (ex: lie, cake), or bound if it is used exclusively alongside a free morpheme (ex: im in impossible). Its actual phonetic representation is the morph, with the different morphs (in-, im-) representing the same morpheme being grouped as its allomorphs. English example: The word unbreakable has three morphemes: un-, a bound morpheme; break, a free morpheme; and -able, a bound morpheme. un- is also a prefix, -able is a suffix. Both un- and -able are affixes. The morpheme plural-s has the morph -s, /s/, in cats (/k? ts/), but -es, /? z/, in dishes (/d z/), and even the voiced -s, /z/, in dogs (/d z/). -s. These are allomorphs. Whether or not a word is divided on all available morphemes is debatable. Some morphologists decompose the words completely as it was formed etymologically while others only decompose what there is evidence to decompose in the modern use of the word. The word governmental has either three morphemes: govern, a free morpheme: ment, a bound morpheme; and -al, a bound morpheme. Or, depending on the syntactic framework, it has two morphemes: government and -al. The word predict has either two morphemes: pre- a bound morpheme, and dict a bound morpheme, or one morpheme: predict a free morpheme. tense, number, aspect, and so on, without deriving a new word or a word in a new grammatical category (as in the dog morpheme if written with the plural marker morpheme -s becomes dogs). They carry grammatical information. Allomorphs are variants of a morpheme, e. g. , the plural marker in English is sometimes realized as /-z/, /-s/ or /-? z/ Other variants Null morpheme Root morpheme Word stem Morphological analysis In natural language processing for Japanese, Chinese and other languages, morphological analysis is a process of segmenting a given sentence into a row of morphemes. It is closely related to Part-of-speech tagging, but word segmentation is required for these languages because word boundaries are not indicated by blank spaces. Famous Japanese morphological analysers include Juman, ChaSen and Mecab. Changing definitions of Morpheme In gennerative grammar the definition of a morpheme depends heavily on whether syntactic trees have morphemes as leafs or features as leafs. Direct surface to syntax mapping LFG – leafs are words Direct syntax to semantics mapping Leafs in syntactic trees spell out morphemes: Distributed morphology – leafs are morphemes o Branches in syntactic trees spell out morphemes:Radical Minimalism and Nanosyntax -leafs are nano morpho-syntactic features Given the definition of morpheme as the smallest meaningful unit Nanosyntax aims to account for idioms where it is often an entire syntactic tree which contributes the smallest meaningful unit. An example idiom is Dont let the cat out of the bag where the idiom is composed of let the cat out of the bag and that might be considered a semantic morpheme, which is composed of many syntactic morphemes. Other cases where the smallest meaningfull unit is larger than a word include some collocations such as in view of and business intelligence where the words together have a specific meaning. The definition of morphemes also play a significant role in the interfaces of generative grammar in the following theoretical constructs; Event semantics The idea that each productive morpheme must have a compositional semantic meaning (a denotation), and if the meaning is there, there must be a morpheme (null or overt). Spell-out The interface where syntactic/semantic structures are spelled-out using words or morphemes with phonological content. This can also be thought of as lexical insertion into the syntactics See also Personal tools Log in / create account Namespaces Article Discussion Variants Views Read View source View history Actions Search [pic] [pic][pic] Navigation Main page Contents Featured content Current events Random article Donate to Wikipedia Interaction Help About Wikipedia Community portal Recent changes Contact Wikipedia Toolbox What links here Related changes Upload file Special pages Permanent link Cite this page Print/export Create a book Download as PDF Printable version Languages Afrikaans Brezhoneg Catala Cesky Cymraeg Dansk Deutsch Eesti Espanol Esperanto Francais Frysk Gaeilge Galego Hornjoserbsce Hrvatski Ido Bahasa Indonesia Interlingua Islenska Italiano Kiswahili Kurdi Limburgs Magyar Nederlands ? Norsk (bokmal)? ? Norsk (nynorsk)? Novial Plattduutsch Polski Portugues Romana Runa Simi Scots Simple English Slovencina / Slovenscina Suomi Svenska Tagalog Turkce Veneto Walon This page was last modified on 31 May 2011 at 04:45. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. a non-profit organization. Contact us Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers [pic] [pic] |We empower you to use this information in making sound instructional decisions to improve reading outcomes. | | | Essentials for Reading Success [pic] |Components of Reading | |Reading research over the last 20 years has identified the critical skills that students must acquire very early in reading | |development to ensure that they can read at grade level by third grade. These skills are in the areas of phonemic awareness,| |phonics, fluency in reading text, vocabulary, and reading comprehension. The development of these skills is critical to | |getting off to a good start in reading, and we can begin to assess them as early as kindergarten. Students who lag behind in| |the development of these skills in early elementary school are in danger of not being able to read at grade level by third | |grade. |Types of Assessment | |Assessment is the process of collecting data for the purposes of specifying and verifying problems, and making instructional| |decisions about students. Assessment may be formal or informal and is conducted through a variety of methods: record | |reviews, interviews, observations, and testing. There are three types of assessments that are typically used to inform | |instruction: screening, progress monitoring, and diagnostic measures. |Layers of Instruction | |Assessment is the process of collecting data for the purposes of speci fying and verifying problems, and making instructional| |decisions about students. Assessment may be formal or informal and is conducted through a variety of methods: record | |reviews, interviews, observations, and testing. There are three types of assessments that are typically used to inform | |instruction: screening, progress monitoring, and diagnostic measures. | Elements of Effective Instruction [pic] High quality reading instruction incorporates the five components of reading delivered through a coherent instructional design. Research has repeatedly demonstrated the importance of initial instruction that includes the five critical components of reading: Phonological Awareness, Phonics, Fluency, Vocabulary, and Comprehension. To be most effective, the five critical components need to be taught explicitly within classrooms that are strongly positive and engaging, use writing activities to support literacy, and provide students with many opportunities to read interesting text and complete authentic reading and writing assignments. Teachers typically follow a core reading curriculum to guide instruction in whole and small group settings. Small group instruction should be individualized to reflect the instructional needs of the students. Individual student needs are determined by formal screening and progress monitoring assessments, classroom assessments, and teacher observations. The goal is to use information from multiple sources to group students in a way that makes instruction in critical reading skills most efficient. For more information on the content and sequence for delivery of these please see Components of Reading. How to Differentiate Instruction [pic] What is Differentiated Instruction? Differentiated Instruction is matching instruction to meet the needs of individual learners. The teacher forms small, flexible teacher–led instructional groups based on student data and observations. The teacher groups students with similar instructional needs, limiting the size of the group based on the intensity of instruction needed. The focus and format of reading skills instruction varies with the skill level of the students. How often and how long the teacher meets with each small group varies depending on student needs. Students who are more at risk will need to meet more frequently and for longer periods. This small group targeted skill instruction supplements and reinforces high quality and consistent initial reading instruction. When is Differentiated Instruction Implemented? Differentiated Instruction is implemented during the 90+ minute reading block. Whole group instruction is provided using the core reading curriculum as a guide, and is usually followed by small group reading centers to develop reading skills both cooperatively and independently. During the reading center time, the classroom teacher meets with small groups to provide systematic and explicit instruction in identified reading skill areas. How is Differentiated Instruction Implemented in the Classroom? Differentiated Instruction is implemented in the teacher-led group. The teacher forms small, flexible groups based on student data and observations. Students and classes vary from one another in many important ways. For that reason, there is no one correct way to place students into small groups for instruction. The suggested number of students per group is 1-4 for struggling readers (intensive and strategic) and 5-8 for those students on grade level for reading. The smaller group size is needed for struggling readers because it allows the teacher more opportunity to individualize reading instruction. The classroom is then organized based on how frequently the teacher needs to meet with each group per week (e. g. , group meets daily, group meets 3 times per week) and the number of minutes per day (e. g. , 10 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes).

Wednesday, March 4, 2020

Vernacular Definition and Examples

Vernacular Definition and Examples Vernacular is the language of a particular group, profession, region, or country, especially as spoken rather than formally written. Since the rise of sociolinguistics in the 1960s, interest in vernacular forms of English speech has developed rapidly. As R.L. Trask has pointed out, vernacular forms are now seen as every bit as worthy of study as standard varieties (Language and Linguistics: Key Concepts, 2007). Examples and Observations Around the middle of the fourteenth century English began to be accepted as an appropriate language for government, law, and literature. In response to this wider use of the vernacular, a debate over its suitability as a means of communicating scripture and theology began in the 1300s.(Judy Ann Ford, John Mirks Festial. DS Brewer, 2006)The Elizabethans had discovered once and for all the artistic power of the vernacular and had freed native writers from a crippling sense of inferiority, for which the classical languages and the classicists were largely responsible.(Richard Foster Jones, The Triumph of the English Language. Stanford University Press, 1953)The BCP [Book of Common Prayer] allowed for celebrations in Latin ..., but required that worship should normally be conducted in a language understanded of the people. Vernacular liturgy was a reform for which Roman Catholics had to wait another 400 years.(Alan Wilson, The Book of Common Prayer, Part 1: An English Ragbag. The Guardia n, Aug. 23, 2010 Writers on Writing: Using The Vernacular   Mark Twain ... transformed elements of regional vernacular speech into a medium of uniquely American literary expression and thus taught us how to capture that which is essentially American in our folkways and manners. For indeed the vernacular process is a way of establishing and discovering our national identity. (Ralph Ellison, Going to the Territory. Random House, 1986)American writers were ... the first to intuit that the catchall web of the vernacular reflected the mind at its conscious level. The new melodious tongue shaped the writer to a greater extent than he shaped the language. (Wright Morris, About Fiction. Harper, 1975)  [W]hen I interrupt the velvety smoothness of my more or less literate syntax with a few sudden words of bar-room vernacular, that is done with the eyes wide open and the mind relaxed but attentive. (Raymond Chandler, letter to Edward Weeks, January 18, 1948)Ive always wanted to bring the books down closer and closer to the characters- to get mysel f, the narrator, out of it as much as I can. And one of the ways to do this is to use the language that the characters actually speak, to use the vernacular, and not ignoring the grammar, the formality of it, to bend it, to twist it, so you get a sense that you are hearing it, not reading it.(Roddy Doyle, quoted by  Caramine White in Reading Roddy Doyle. Syracuse University Press, 2001 Two Worlds of Writing Theres a newish world of writing where lots of people are busy all hours of the day and night emailing, tweeting, and blogging on the internet. Students startle their professors by sending chatty emails using the slang they write to buddies on Facebook. Much writing in this new world is a kind of speaking onto the screen; indeed, plenty of people, especially literate people, dont consider this writing to be writing. Email? Thats not writing! Actually, people have been writing in everyday vernacular spoken language for centuries in diaries, informal personal letters, grocery lists, and exploratory musings to figure out their feelings or thoughts. ...So in one world of writing, people feel free to speak onto the screen or page; in the other, people feel pressured to avoid speech on the page. I wont join the chorus of literate commentators who lament all the bad writing in the world of email and web. I see problems with writing in both worlds. Id say that most writing is not very good, whether its literate writing or e-writing, and whether it comes from students, amateurs, well-educated people, or learned scholars.(Peter Elbow, Vernacular Eloquence: What Speech Can Bring to Writing. Oxford Univ. Press, 2012) The New Vernacular ​​Like its antecedents, the new  vernacular represents a democratic impulse, an antidote to vanity and literary airs. Its friendly, its familiar. But familiar in both senses. The new vernacular imitates spontaneity but sounds rehearsed. It has a franchised feel, like the chain restaurant that tells its patrons, Youre family.In part this is just a matter of clichà ©. Some writers try to casualize their prose with friendly phrases such as you know or you know what? Or even um, as in um, hel-lo? ...The new vernacular writer is studiedly sincere. Sincere even when ironic, ironically sincere. Whatever its other goals, the first purpose of such prose is ingratiation. Of course, every writer wants to be liked, but this is prose that seeks an instant intimate relationship. It makes aggressive use of the word you- bet you thought- and even when the you is absent, it is implied. The writer works hard to be lovable.(Tracy Kidder and Richard Todd, Good Prose: The Art of Nonficti on. Random House, 2013) Vernacular Rhetoric [N]arratives of vernacular rhetoric can afford a certain accuracy in gauging public opinion that otherwise is unavailable. Were leaders to hear these opinions and take them seriously, the quality of public discourse might take a positive turn. Understanding peoples concerns and why they hold them holds promise for helping leaders to communicate with societys active members rather than manipulating them.(Gerard A. Hauser, Vernacular Voices: The Rhetoric of Publics and Public Spheres. Univ. of South Carolina Press, 1999) The Lighter Side of the Vernacular [Edward Kean] once said that he was probably best known for coining the word cowabunga (originally spelled with a k) as a greeting for Chief Thunderthud, a character on [The Howdy Doody Show]. The word has become part of American vernacular, used by the cartoon character Bart Simpson and by the crime-fighting Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles. (Dennis Hevesi, Edward Kean, Chief Writer of ‘Howdy Doody,’ Dies at 85. The New York Times, Aug. 24, 2010) Pronunciation: ver-NAK-ye-ler EtymologyFrom the Latin, native